Why This Test Works Differently
A 2024 review by relationship scientists Emily Impett, Haeyoung Gideon Park, and Amy Muise (University of Toronto), published in Current Directions in Psychological Science, examined 10 independent studies on Gary Chapman's five love languages. None of them supported the theory's three central claims: that each person has one primary love language, that there are exactly five, or that couples who share a language report higher satisfaction.
One detail stood out: when the standard forced-choice quiz format was replaced with a simple rating scale, people stopped picking a single "winner" — they rated most or all of the five languages as meaningful to them. The forced-choice format was manufacturing a false sense of a single preference. This test uses a rating scale from the start, for exactly that reason.
About this test
Written and maintained by Camille G., founder of Loch Ness Paris. This page summarizes peer-reviewed relationship science (see Sources below); it is not itself original research, and results are for self-reflection, not a clinical or diagnostic assessment.
Sources & Further Reading
- Impett, E. A., Park, H. G., & Muise, A. (2024). Popular Psychology Through a Scientific Lens: Evaluating Love Languages From a Relationship Science Perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 33(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214231217663
- Chapman, G. (1992). The Five Love Languages: How to Express Heartfelt Commitment to Your Mate. Northfield Publishing.
Disclosure: this test is independently built and is not affiliated with Dr. Gary Chapman or the Five Love Languages® brand. See our legal notice.